July 4, 2026
Welcome to my latest portfolio update.
This one is a bit more eventful than usual.
We sold another rental property, and now there’s only one more to go.
If you’re new here, these posts are simply to share what’s going on with our investments, explain how things are evolving behind the scenes, and any changes that are being made.
In this article, we’ll discuss:
— Current wealth allocation
— How much dividends we earned for FY26
— Share portfolio breakdown
— Property update + future investing plans
If you want to read my previous portfolio update, you can find it here. But let’s kick things off with the property news…
As mentioned in my last update, this year we planned to sell our remaining two rental properties in Perth.
Both are 3×2 villas, in different suburbs roughly 10km from Perth. The first one went on the market in March after the lease expired.
We actually sold a few shares to raise some cash to spend a bit of money on the property. One of the downsides of keeping a very low cash balance lol. We had the property painted, carpeted, styled/staged, and a few other smaller things.
People often debate whether doing these things is worth it or not – especially staging with a furniture package. The truth is, you can never know for sure because you can’t run a live comparison of your property with/without it.
After selling a few properties with and without spending money on presentation, I’ve come to the conclusion that, on balance, it’s usually worth it. But it does depend on the property itself, price of works, and the target buyer – so there’s no right answer.
Anyway, we hoped to fetch a price somewhere in the high 800s. We had one serious buyer, and one low-ball offer. It ended up selling for just over 900k – so we’re very happy with the outcome!
That said, the home opens were much quieter than both ourselves and the agent expected. And they said it occurred across most of their opens. By the time settlement rolled around, they told us that things had calmed down big time from the frenzied behaviour earlier this year.
From what I’ve heard from others in the market, the recent budget has only solidified that slowdown. So it looks like we may have sold just in time.
Now, I don’t think prices are going into freefall. But when uncertainty creeps in, things can become temporarily depressed for a while. I had the same experience trying to sell a property back in 2019, when Bill Shorten’s tax policies were announced, the market went very quiet, very quickly.
More on property in a moment. But now let’s get onto some charts and then I’ll share a few thoughts on strategy and plans going forward.
As I write this, here’s the rough allocation of our wealth:
The main changes from last time are…
— Investment property equity down
— Super up
— Home equity up
— Cash up
The percentage allocations don’t really move as much as I expected. But I realised that’s because as the numbers grow larger, it takes more dollars to move the needle. Plus the remaining assets are moving differently between the updates.
Anyway, we’ve allocated most of the cash from sale, but not all of it.
With the sale proceeds, we used 5 years worth of catchup contributions for Mrs SMA – the same thing we did with our previous sale (in my name) late last year.
There’s also a nice chunk set aside for both our tax bills – which I’ve removed from this calculation. And still some cash to invest (more on this in a minute).
For those who are new here, the ‘Pearler’ slice does not refer to my brokerage account (as a commenter asked about last time). It represents a small stake I own in the company 🙂
The ‘Home Equity’ portion is now getting fairly large. This means there’s probably opportunity here to borrow against our home to invest further – something to consider.
Below is the latest chart showing the overall level of income produced for the financial year ending June 2026.
Since the tax statements from the ETFs haven’t come out yet, I’m guesstimating the franking level of VAS for the final dividend at 75%. I’ll be sure to update this for the next update.
This number is simply dividends and franking credits.
Explainer on our dividend history:
In 2021, we sold an IP and invested a lump sum. So, 2022 income would’ve been much higher, but we then sold a big chunk of shares to buy a house (wasn’t planned before). We then sold another IP and transferred the loan to our current home, giving us a huge pile of cash to invest (explained here). We also decided to become ‘fully invested’ and invest the remaining cash in our offset.
Well, that’s not the ideal direction! But there’s a few things at play here.
With our increasing allocation to global shares (VGS), and selling two REITs last year, a lower portfolio yield is expected.
Having said that, this year VAS seems to have had a lower distributions (around $3 per unit vs $3.50 ish per unit for the last few years). Part of that may be slightly lower turnover in the fund, lower dividends from Australian companies, or both.
Of course, given VGS has recently returned an average yield of only 1.5%, we could easily harvest a further 2% income by trimming some of the capital gains. This would actually take the portfolio income to around $60k. If we needed the income, that’s exactly what I’d do.
Alright, so there’s one more property to sell.
With this one, the lease expires in a few months time. And it’s actually a bit tricky. We’re tossing up out of three approaches:
1- Wait until the tenant moves out, spend money improving the property, and do the same then sell. But that takes time. So that would actually push the selling time closer to the end of the year, when there are less buyers. Then we run the risk of having a lengthy and expensive vacancy period until the market gets going again in mid January.
2- If the market heats up again and things are selling well, just sell it earlier with the tenants still in there. Settlement would fall after the lease expires, so it wouldn’t deter owner occupiers. The issue here is not being able to maximise sale price due to selling it ‘as is’ and having the tenant still in there – versus having it beautifully staged, painted, etc.
3- If the market is a bit soft, or due to point 1, extend the lease for a further 6 months. Ideally, by this time the market would be stronger due to the ongoing undersupply (there’s still not enough building vs population growth). This way, there’s no timing issues and we can get the property in its best condition for sale.
While I don’t think prices will boom further from here, I’d like to avoid selling in a period of weakness. It can make a fairly big difference. So I think we’ll play it by ear and see how things shape up over the next few months.
Long time readers will know I used to invest in Aussie LICs.
The old, boring, low cost variety that follows a long term buy/hold strategy, with a focus on providing shareholders with a decent income stream that grows over time.
It came to my attention recently that some are trading at very large discounts to the value of their assets. To a level that has basically not been seen before.
I think it’s for 3 reasons. The massive popularity of ETFs, recent decade underperformance, and high interest rates making term deposits more appealing to retirees than dividends.
Don’t get me wrong, I prefer an index fund as much as the next guy. But if Argo is trading at a 15-20% discount, then far out it’s tempting. Especially given it’s also less ‘top heavy’ than VAS.
And yes, they may underperform, but with a discount that large, you’re being compensated for that. You’d be getting an extra 1-1.5% gross income above the underlying portfolio. So underperformance would have to be more than this for you to be worse off. Yes the discount may widen, but there’s a limit to that – and again that would increase the relative attractiveness and underlying cheapness of that basket of stocks.
I have an internal resistance towards adding things to the portfolio, but I’m only human, lol.
Another thing I’m considering is… bitcoin.
While I’ve never been interested in non income producing assets, I have kept a very distant eye on it over the last 5 years or so.
Then, about 18 months ago I posted this on my socials:
Since that time, I read the arguments on both sides and waded through the fanatical talking points.
“It’s going to zero”
“It’s going to take over the world”
The price also happens to be currently down around 50% from the highs. Anyway, I’ll put together an article on the topic to explain my thoughts on it.
One thing that bothers me about adding things to the portfolio is that I’m an all or nothing type person. I don’t want to add a small amount of anything – that just seems pointless and almost like clutter.
Small additional holdings add mental load and admin without really moving the needle on performance or diversification. I understand something that’s wildly volatile can be an exception to this. But I’d rather not bother unless it’s a decent amount, which adds gravity to the decision and means it needs more consideration.
I’ve been thinking a bit more about the portfolio these days as it gets closer to becoming 100% shares (when you include super and exclude home equity). Perhaps that’s why I’m getting curious about other holdings?
After doing my spending article, I realised how our assets are now a real-life snowball. When I did the numbers, our assets have created 3-4X as many dollars as our part-time work efforts since 2017.
That’s pretty bizarre to think about, and also very exciting.
Only recently I caught up with a reader-turned-friend Mr MND. Over lunch, we chatted about life, travels, and all sorts of things. We followed it up with a long walk. As we walked, we both expressed our child-like amazement at the power of investing that has never gone away even after all these years.
It made me realise how important it is to have people you can talk to about this stuff. For most people, this sort of approach to life is just never going to be on their radar – even if they could do their own version of it.
There’s perceived safety in the herd. So for most people, a mix of fear, beliefs, desires, and the good old status quo keeps them on the standard path.
All that to say, no matter where you are on this path, KEEP GOING.
If you just keep doing the right things with your money, month after month, eventually you create a beautiful snowball of cascading benefits that are hard to imagine when you pick up that first clump of snow.
With the upcoming CGT changes I decided to try Navexa after using Sharesight for about 10 years.
The main reason is manual parcel selection, which gives you more control around tax outcomes – something that will become more valuable going forward.
It was actually easier than I expected to setup, which is what I was dreading to be honest.
Which one should you use?
If you’re just starting out, Sharesight’s free plan covers basic performance tracking, and their ‘tax pack’ is a cheap and useful add-on. For many people, that’s probably plenty.
That said, Navexa tends to work out cheaper if you want more features, a greater level of tax control, have lots of holdings or multiple portfolios.
If you’d rather just use a spreadsheet and DIY, go for it – but with the new changes I’d say you’re a very brave soul! I’m far too lazy for that, even in my frugal days, lol.
By the way, both links above are affiliate links so you’ll get a discount if you sign up that way, and I’ll receive a small kickback. As always, I only ever recommend things I genuinely approve of.
Bitcoin, wow, interesting! Looking forward to reading your article and thoughts on it Dave. Seems quite a departure from your previous statements and the FIRE philosophy in general.
I don’t tend to pay much attention, but I was under the impression Bitcoin was quite popular in the FIRE space? I’ll be sure to flesh out my previous statements/thinking on it and how that compares to today 🙂
It’s so refreshing reading your emails. In a time where our inboxes fill up over night while we are sleeping, I sift through ignoring most bits always open yours. I think it’s because it’s always filled with thought provoking advice and your own experience. No advertising, no hidden agenda.
Thanks SMA
Wow that’s really lovely to hear Tracy, thanks very much! I do try to make sure the newsletters and content are valuable – certainly don’t want to be spamming people given how many emails we all get these days.
Funny you mention LIC’s , I was thinking of selling my large holding of AFIC and deploying it into my super and VAS .
It seems now with the CGT changes ,that it might be better for me as I’m 3 years off 60 and retiring that super might be a no brainer . Loved your last book by the way! .
Hey Dean. Glad you liked the new book 🙂
Yeah I can imagine a lot of LIC holders are actually annoyed at the share price performance, which is understandable. That obviously creates an opportunity as well if others think it’s undervalued. The LICs do seem to be a better structure over ETFs for the new rules, so it’ll be interesting to see how it all rolls out (and there are downsides with LICs of course to consider).
And yes, super is often more appealing than personal shares if near access age.
You’ve come full circle! Back on the LIC train. I agree Argo looks great value now if you intend to buy and hold to live off the dividends.
Haha! It does look like good value for sure. It’s funny you say that. People would say the same if I ever bought a rental property again. But I’m never 100% for or against something – it depends on the context, prices, goals, etc.
I have been busy topping up Lic’s lately.
Still can’t get my head around Bitcoin No income.
Another great post Dave
Nice job Len, thanks for sharing. Which ones, our of curiosity? A friend of mine recently pointed out the steep discounts as I hadn’t been paying attention.
I think the ETF annd LIC debate needs to be reconsidered..VHY is supposre to be a high yielding ETF but the latest distriibution was only 40 cents and the year so far has been very diappionting. Argo on the other hand has maintained it’s fully frankked dividend. Great news for income investors. ETF”s are not the magic solution many have come to bellieve.
Both have their pros and cons and suit different times/investors I reckon. I would agree that LICs have been unreasonably demonised/dismissed, which is probably why the discounts exist right now.
VHY and VAS have both yielded a low amount this year relative to their past. Probably a combination of high prices, lower dividends, and no/low turnover. I would expect them to have higher ongoing payouts than the recent 12 months has shown.
To be fair, I think most people who opt for index funds are not aiming for a high income or obviously a fully franked income. They’re more focused on total return performance. But Argo has paid some very nice dividends 🙂
I’ve got 3 years until I quit working and all the spare cash is going into super, so I can get it tax free and not be clobbered with tax when I need the money
Nice!
Hello ,
Whats not to like about LIC s . All my income comes from LIC s . I pay no tax and I’m content and living the dream .
Why are we so complicated as a species . Bitcoin , Gambling, lotto , large mortgages , keeping up with the Jones’s, lifestyle inflation and the mindless pursuit of its never enough ….bring on the robots 🤖 😉
Take care .
Haha, you’re right Jimmy – always nice to hear from you 🙂
Which LICs do you like Jimmy?
Dave,
I’ve followed your journey for a long time, and of all the decisions you’ve made, the one that surprised me most was moving to a 100% share portfolio.
If it was primarily driven by a personal dislike of property management, the desire to simplify your life, or to release equity (which I’d say you timed quite well), then I completely understand. My questions are more around the investment rationale.
1. Negative gearing grandfathering: With the recent grandfathering changes, existing investment properties have effectively been handed a golden opportunity. As your dividend income grows over time, the negative gearing benefits could increasingly offset your passive income. Since this is only available for investment properties purchased before Budget night, did you model the long-term value of retaining them?
2. Long-term returns: Your investment properties delivered incredible returns. Was your decision to sell based on a genuine belief that property will underperform shares over the long term, or simply because you expect better risk-adjusted returns elsewhere? Did you consider pulling out equity through debt recycling instead of selling the properties outright?
3. Diversification: Your latest podcast was all about building a recession-proof portfolio, yet you’ve now moved almost entirely into what is arguably the most volatile major asset class—equities. 🙂 Why not keep a mix of property and shares rather than concentrating everything in one asset class?
Cheers,
Mandar
Hi Mandar. If you’ve followed me for a long time, you would know that since the start of this blog in 2017, moving to an all share portfolio was always the goal (so that’s not new).
In the beginning, and for most of the time, it was motivated by the need to create investment income to live off. Much easier to do with shares than property for the most part. In more recent times, I’ve come to appreciate the sheer simplicity of having a fully digital asset base and not having to deal with any property related issues or costs. So it’s all the reasons you mentioned: simplicity, dislike of property hassles + release equity to reinvest elsewhere.
Great questions by the way, here are some replies…
1- I did not model this. Properties are neutrally geared. I could potentially borrow against them to buy more shares, but then I’m still basically holding highly leveraged property which I’m not really interested in. I’d rather offload and put the whole amount into shares, not just what I can borrow against. Can also borrow against PPOR to do the same and get negative gearing benefit by buying shares.
2- They actually didn’t deliver incredible returns. They grew at around 4-5% per annum and when I account for stamp duty, selling costs, CGT, and 15 years of holding costs, the return has been similar or slightly less than a diversified share portfolio (since a VAS/VGS combo has performed really well over the same timeframe). The leveraged growth is only one side, everyone ignores the massive costs involved which dramatically subtract from the return. As for pulling equity out and keeping maximum debt, this is more difficult to do in a situation like mine – sole trader income, dividend income, pt work etc. More leverage also eats into cashflow – dividends will be less than interest on borrowings, so this makes it harder to live off if I tried to get the best of both worlds in that way.
3- That podcast was actually about being a recession proof PERSON, not a recession proof portfolio – two very different things! Why not keep both? Because I don’t need a mix of both assets for everything to be fine in a recession, even a long one. As I wrote about in a recent article: https://strongmoneyaustralia.com/how-to-never-run-out-of-money-in-retirement/ So I have the flexibility and financial strength to invest in a way that I prefer, not just the one that gives me maximum diversification. In any case, it’s more ‘recession proof’ to have no debt and have a cash-generating portfolio vs betting on leverage and capital growth via negative gearing.
Hope that clarifies 🙂
Hi Dave,
Have to agree, property seems good when you sell with substantial capital gains and the news keep reporting on rising house price. The reality is whenever you have to deal with people, you get all the hassles with it as well, like lousy tenants or neighbours, underperforming agents, etc. Plus the occassional unplanned cost of repairs.
Great update Dave. Congrats on the property sale. 1 more to go!
The LIC vs ETF thing is interesting to me with majority of FIRE folk favoring the latter.
One thing that sticks out is LICs give 100% fully franked dividends where ETF like VAS give 75-80%.
This would appear that LICs are the better option for generating a passive income but am I missing something with ETFs?
Are ETFs more geared towards dividends earned plus drawing down on their growth over time to produce the passive income?
Thanks for reading
LICs do have fully franked dividends, but the reason for that is they pay tax and ETFs do not. So the same dividends received by the LIC will be taxed and then franking attached when they pay it to you vs passed straight to you untaxed for an ETF.
The reason they’re appealing as passive income assets is that they operate as a company so they’re able to pay a smoother level of dividend income over time. They also aim to select companies which are suitable for generating income.
The reason ETFs are more favoured is because they typically have a higher overall total return. LICs and active management tends to underperform a bit over time largely due to not holding all companies so they can often miss the biggest winners.
Again love this! Especially the final thoughts bit. So beautifully and inspiringly written and reminded me again of why I started and why I stick it out at work haha. One of those days where I need to keep reminding myself of the end goal. Makes all the work a little more tolerable 🙂 Thank you Dave
We need to constantly remind ourselves why we’re doing all this and the benefits that it builds, even if those benefits aren’t immediately obvious on a daily basis. Glad you enjoyed the read Hazel!
Thoughts on STRC Dave?
Absolutely no idea never looked at it