November 1, 2025
You’ve probably heard headlines like this before:
“House prices are booming, locking out the next generation of homebuyers.”
Which makes people feel like: “If I don’t buy soon, maybe I’ll never be able to buy.”
The media loves this narrative. Combining fear and housing is the perfect recipe for clicks.
And to be fair, there’s a grain of truth in it – especially for folks who don’t manage their money well.
But for YOU, dear readers – and anyone who’s half decent with personal finance – this narrative is completely false.
As you’ll see, you’re in a better position than it seems. Even if you’re renting, even if you don’t want to buy for a while, and even if house prices keep rising.
So let’s unpack this ‘priced out forever’ fear, and more importantly, break down why it’s mostly nonsense for this community.
You can also listen to the podcast version here.
Let’s start with this well-worn statement.
You might see house prices jump $100,000 in a year and think to yourself, “There’s no way I can save that fast.”
You worry you’re falling further behind.
While this seems accurate on the surface, it’s actually misleading.
Because as counter-intuitive as it might seem, you don’t need to save as much as property growth dollar-for-dollar to keep up. What matters most is how much of that property you could afford, relative to your current wealth.
Here’s an example:
Let’s say you have $10k in savings. A home is $500k. You can afford 2% of it.
Now imagine that home rises 20%, to $600k in 3 years. But after 3 years, you now have $60k in savings (very achievable).
So prices grew $100k, while your savings only grew $50k. You’d probably feel depressed. The media will say “Property prices outpaced your savings – you’ve now further behind!”
But guess what? Your savings can now cover 10% of the home – so in reality, you actually caught up.
You increased your proportionate buying power. And that’s what actually matters. Sadly, almost nobody understands this, but it’s incredibly important.
And most readers here save way more than $15–20k a year! Many couples are saving $50k or more. Because you do all the right things – you optimise your expenses, increase your income, and you put long term goals over short-term desires.
OK, what about during a full fledged property boom? Surely that’s gotta be an ugly picture?!
Say the home in question doubled in value over 5 years, from $500k to $1m.
Saving $20k per year gets you to $100k in savings over 5 years = you (again) have 10% of the property covered. This ignores your initial $10k and any returns you might earn.
That’s a very different picture than what the media is telling you and how most people think about it.
Here’s the brutal reality: If you can’t save money, you’re already priced out.
Not just out of housing, but of freedom and the truly comfortable life you want some day.
The truth is, some people will always be priced out – whether due to circumstances that are insurmountable, or from poor money management.
But if you can save – and if you’ve been following my content, you absolutely can – then you’re in a much better spot.
Because it’s not property prices alone that shape your future. It’s your ability to build wealth. And that’s fueled by:
— Your savings rate (income vs spending)
— Your investing habits
— Your long term thinking (delayed gratification)
— Your flexibility, adaptability and willingness to accept tradeoffs
That’s what builds optionality and control over your life. And the longer you do these things, the stronger your position becomes.
In the beginning it might seem like, “Prices are so high, I’ll never afford anything good.” But later, if you keep stacking your savings and do the right things, it’s more like, “Wait, I actually have a few options here!”
Around here we focus on what we can control, not what we can’t. That’s how you build a motivating life of self-reliance and forward-motion.
You might think this is some feel-good short-term solution or mental accounting.
Will this really work over the long term if property grows faster than wages?
Let’s explore a more realistic longer term scenario.
Say the median dwelling costs $800k and grows at 5% per year forever – a pretty reasonable yet slightly pessimistic assumption for the sake of our example (if wages grow at 3-4%).
Now let’s say you:
— Start with $40k in savings
— Save $25k per year
— Invest in shares, earning 7% per annum after-tax
Here’s how things look over a few decades:
So, even though property gets more expensive, you have NOT fallen behind.
In fact, by Year 40, your portfolio equals the home price, despite starting at just 5% of the home’s value.
Most people focus on the ‘home price’ column and get paralysed by the big scary numbers. But the most important column is the one on the right hand side.
Now of course, if you cash in some (or all) of your portfolio to buy a home, there’s CGT. But the underlying principle is undeniable:
If you can grow your wealth at a faster rate than home prices grow – which is fairly easy to do by saving and investing – your relative buying power INCREASES over time.
And this is only your personal investments – there’s also super, which will also be another substantial pot of cash.
If you end up wanting to buy later in life – super can form part of that buying power. It can be combined with your other investments, or used on its own when the time comes – either as a lump sum or income stream.
This also ignores pay increases, finding more ways to save, inheritances, and so on. In reality, as long as you’re saving, you aren’t stuck. You’re slowly but surely making progress and building optionality.
Someone might say, “Well, how can you even save that much when rents are high.” To which I’d argue, if you can’t save while renting, you DEFINITELY can’t afford to own.
As I explored in my monster Rent vs Buy post, these things go in cycles, but the true cost difference between renting and owning is often tens of thousands per year for the same property (where most people live).
Yes, property might outpace wages. But it won’t outpace a committed saver/wealth builder with a long term plan.
So don’t panic if prices keep going up. Your ability to save is your superpower. And by the way, this principle still applies at higher price points.
In Australia, renting is seen as a temporary step – this weird state of purgatory you put up with until you can finally get on the property ladder and join the special club of successful property-owning adults.
You’re either in the club, or you’re an outsider and haven’t ‘made it’ yet.
Think about how society treats different types of risk:
— If someone wants to start a business, people will be worried for them and they’ll be urged to stay in the safety of their job.
— If they invest heavily in the sharemarket, people will say it’s risky and warn them they could lose all their money.
— If the same person buys a home with seven figures of debt, people will congratulate them on such a wise purchase.
It would be funnier how dogmatic this mindset is if it wasn’t 97% of the population. For those of you on the path to financial independence, you realise this framework is outdated – or at least heavily flawed and situation-dependent.
Renting doesn’t mean you’re lagging in some way. Renting and investing can be a very powerful strategy for those who are open-minded enough to see it as such.
And sure, it’s not for everyone. Renting certainly has its downsides, which are spoken about endlessly. But it can absolutely work for people who know how to manage money.
Read my full breakdown of the both the problems and opportunities of renting vs owning here.
You might not want to rent forever – and that’s fine. But if you’re happy renting for now – enjoying the freedom and flexibility, AND you’re investing a healthy amount along the way, you’re going to be OK.
Renting may just work better for your situation right now. You can always buy at some point down the road – when your life situation changes, and when the mortgage won’t pressure you financially.
This fear around being ‘priced out forever’ simply doesn’t apply if you’re good with money. The ability to wait – to delay lifestyle creep, avoid liabilities and expensive purchases – is a key competitive advantage in the modern world.
Consistent action and patience are an incredibly powerful combination that serves you well across all areas of life.
When prices are booming and rents feel expensive, it can seem like things will never calm down.
But property moves in cycles. It always has, and it always will.
Prices surge, then they slow down, and yes, they even drop too. Rents shoot up, then they level off and stagnate for a while (and sometimes fall too).
We just don’t know when the slowdown will occur, which adds to the frustration. But part of this picture is zooming out and realising there will always be more opportunities in the future.
So if things seem a bit insane right now, don’t pressure yourself to make any rash moves.
Instead, it may make more sense to be patient, keep saving, and think long term. That’s what puts you in the best position to buy when the time is right.
By the way, I’m not saying to wait for the sake of waiting, if you can afford to buy (more on that in minute).
And if the security of home ownership is super important to you, that’s completely valid. But that doesn’t mean you have to buy immediately or you’ll miss out.
As the numbers show, you can rent while you build wealth, and then buy from a position of strength later.
‘Security’ is not a magic feature that is unlocked solely by a successful home loan application. The truest sense of security comes from wealth, optionality, and having a sense of control over your life.
That can come from owning a home, but it doesn’t have to. Housing does not have a monopoly over the feeling of security (no pun intended!).
While owning a home gives you a certain kind of stability, financial independence gives you several kinds of freedom.
I know these thoughts may not be popular, and there’ll be a kneejerk reaction to many of these statements. But my goal is to break through the toxic combination of religion and fear that surrounds the Aussie housing market – helping you see the world in a more accurate and empowering way.
You’ve seen the numbers. And you’ve seen how saving and investing can build wealth faster than property prices rise.
But I’ve also been sprinkling in another theme here: how do you want to operate your life?
Do you want to be the kind of person who does something out of fear or social pressure? Or can you separate yourself from that, focus on the bigger picture and know you’ll be fine even if you follow a different strategy?
In some ways, it’s not really about renting or owning. It’s about fear vs confidence. It’s about reacting to the external world vs planning your own path.
Quite often, the real challenge comes back to our own identity – how we make decisions, how we deal with uncertainty, and very often, how comfortable we are straying from the herd.
The most important factor in your financial future isn’t owning a bunch of bricks. It’s being a person who knows how to build wealth.
But if you’ve been saving for a while, you may be wondering…
If you’re in a financial position to buy – and doing so will give you peace of mind – then I do think purchasing something sooner make sense.
Especially if you meet several of the following criteria:
— You plan to live in the property someday
— You’re comfortable having a mortgage
— You’ve got surplus cash to keep investing
— You don’t mind being a landlord for a while
What matters is making it a strategic decision, not one rooted in FOMO.
And if you’re reading this ad not sure how you can buy something without derailing your finances, I’ll be writing about that soon.
In general, it’s wise to start with something smaller and more affordable. You can eventually get an expensive place if you want – but do it AFTER you’ve built a nice level of wealth. Otherwise, you just become a mortgage slave (despite how many compliments you might get from peers or family!).
Most people do the opposite. They max themselves out and are then left hanging on every RBA decision, wondering why they can’t save.
While some people feel like the housing situation is hopeless. You now realise the outlook isn’t quite as bleak as you’ve been told.
If you’re someone who’s thoughtful with money – who invests and lives below your means – then you’re absolutely NOT going to be ‘priced out’ of the housing market.
Not even close.
If anything, you’ll be catching up, and speeding past the average internet complainer in a way they’ll never understand. All without HAVING to buy a home as soon as possible.
At the end of the day, the more wealth you build, the more options you have. And when you know what you’re doing, all the noise becomes irrelevant.
The housing market doesn’t get to decide your future. You do!
📘 My Book
Your complete guide financial independence in Australia. Available on Amazon, Audible and Spotify.
🏡 Mortgage Broker
Deanna and her team have helped me and many readers with home loan strategies over the years (including debt recycling). Check them out.
💼 Financial Advice
For those wanting personalised guidance with strategy, super, tax, or retirement, I can connect you with someone I trust. Find out more.
If you use the above services, this blog may receive a benefit at no extra cost to you. I only recommend things I use myself and genuinely believe in – thanks if you choose to check them out.
Great article it’s so true like all things ignoring the noise and figuring out one’s strategy is the way to go. I know for myself it felt like property prices were out of reach when I bought in 2018. But I had made a conscious decision to move to a seaside town, and pursue a lifestyle that allowed me to live life on my own terms. It turned that my mortgage would be less than had I bought in Melbourne. I was looking at property with a different lens.
That’s awesome, great to hear you found a personalised solution – that’s what it’s all about 🙂
Thanks, we enjoy your newsletters and while we agree about the current housing situation, your equation seems to be missing stamp duty on buying the house and capital gains tax on your investments. Can you further elaborate on this please?
The equation is to simply show how it’s more than possible to keep/catch up – that is all. There are lots of other things we could add to the discussion but then it becomes more of a complex distraction to the overarching simple principle.
Feel free to account for CGT, stamp duty, different returns or savings rates than mentioned, substantial moving costs for owners over the time period, etc.
After ceasing work in 2018 due to illness, I moved to the regional NSW as I could not affords to continue to rent in Sydney without an income, as my regional investment properties were negatively geared. In late 2018 I received a few hundred thousands dollars from my share of my deceased parents farm, which was not enough to buy a home, especially as I had no income. I rented a house and invested the rest of the money in the sharemarket. In late 2019 I was again due to receive a couple of hundred thousand dollars but this was draw out in court until late 2023 and I received a much smaller amount. As house prices had surged I again invested the money in the sharemarket. What Dave suggests, I can confirms works. I have gone from a few hundred thousand dollars and a low value, negatively geared investment portfolio in late 2018 to having a multi million dollar share portfolio, a million dollar plus property portfolio and close to a million dollars in superannuation. I still rent and invest. It works, but the downside is the emotional aspects, as some of my close friends, including my partner, say I am stupid for investing in the sharemarket. As such, I have learned to keep quite about my wealth. It keep me in my circle of friends and at 69 I can tell you it is the quality of your friends and relationships your form and not the money in the bank that truly determines the quality of your life. Money has just given me greater options and freedom.
Thanks very much for sharing that Grey, it’s great to hear you made a fantastic outcome from an less than ideal set of events. It’s also a bit of a shame that such an approach like what you’ve followed draws so much criticism. I guess it’s just people reacting emotionally to actions and choices different than their own – which is pretty common really.
Great piece, Dave. Completely agree that long-term investing and a strong savings rate matter far more than headline house prices.
One point worth adding is the servicing reality at current rates. Even disciplined savers can find that interest costs now exceed their annual savings capacity, which changes the practical meaning of being priced out.
At today’s average IO rate (~6.5%), someone saving $30–50k a year might face $50–60k in annual interest alone, regardless of % of purchase price saved. The constraint, then, isn’t simply house prices versus savings but serviceability.
Totally aligned on the mindset; just wanted to highlight how the numbers play out
Price
Deposit
Loan
Annual Interest
$800k
$65k
$735k
$47.6k
$1.3m
32.5%
$877.5k
$56.9k
$2.12m
55.6%
$941k
$61.0k
I’m not sure I understand your reasoning here, so my answer below is guessing at a few possible things you’re trying to get at.
You said: “At today’s average IO rate (~6.5%), someone saving $30–50k a year might face $50–60k in annual interest alone” – A saver today is not paying current interest rates though?
By the way, IO rates are 5.5% not 6.5%. And it’s not true to say deposit size saved wouldn’t affect that, of course it would as it limits how much borrowing is required and therefore lessens impact of servicing constraints.
It almost looks like you may be trying to compare buying now vs later with those interest calcs. I said do it sooner if you can. So that isn’t the question – it’s whether they can possibly buy AT ALL.
And if you’re forwarding multiple decades into the future to look at interest cost, and then comparing gross interest dollars to today, that’s unreasonable, because you have income growth which would likely be a little more than inflation. Meaning those future interest dollars are far cheaper than today.
In any case, the overarching principle doesn’t change, which is the whole point of the article 🙂
Hi Dave, I like the article and the thinking with it but I do have a question as to why you’ve used only 5% as the average growth rate for the property but 7% for shares? It looks like over the past 30 years property and shares in Aus have grown in the mid 9% range, so minus a couple % for inflation and both would sit around the 7% mark.
I assume that if mid 7% was used your time frame might blow out from 40 years to 60 years or so (rough guesses) to have covered the full house price, which potentially means people are in their 80s before they’ve accumulated the total wealth if they were switched on enough to start investing in their 20s.
It sort of feels like the numbers are being massaged to prove one particular point or am I missing some key info?
Hope that doesn’t sound too negative, I’m a fan of your articles and being in my early 30s your work has helped my partner and I start our FIRE journey.
Cheers,
Rich
I’ve used 5% as I don’t believe 7% is a reasonable long term growth rate from here for a variety of reasons. This article has a good summary – growth over the last 20 years has been about 5% and may be similar going forward: https://prosolution.com.au/property-growth-outlook.
The 7% for shares is growth + income. In this scenario only capital growth for the home is applicable (you are not receiving rental income when you live in the home, but shares you get both while also paying rent). As for 9% returns, that refers to total return – growth and income for both not just growth.
Both of these return figures are lower than historical numbers since 1900, so I’ve been conservative with both relative to history.
If you assume far higher total returns from property, then yes, that would extend the timeframe. But I believe that’s an unreasonable expectation to work with. And remember the point isn’t that you need to wait until you have 100% of the home price covered, it’s simply that your wealth position increases in proportion to the avg home price because of your savings + investment return. You can, as most people manage to do, buy after 3-7 years of saving instead.
This is simply pushing back against the idea that you might never be able to buy if prices keep growing and you don’t own immediately. Hope that makes sense.
Great article. I think there are a couple of things I would say to the naysayers. First, the maths is bang on about savings. The share returns you mention are realistic. In fact, these returns could be improved or at least equaled using the First Home Super Saver Scheme (FHSSS), where the tax savings can help make up the difference if the market returns are lower than your 7% or help move the purchase timeline forward.
The other worry is borrowing power, e.g, that you might have to wait too long and no longer qualify for a loan. I ran the numbers myself. Using the CBA borrowing power calculator with their current 5.34% rate and assuming a couple with no kids, no debts, and spending of $40K on non-housing expenses , I got you needed a before tax income of $190K for the $800K house scenario (borrowing $720K). For the $1 million house scenario (borrowing $900K with a $100K deposit), the required before-tax income was $220K. This difference is just $30K of combined pre tax income. I think this is very doable for a couple. The other criticism could be LMI cost. The calculator just adds to the loan. The difference here I estimate is around $10K between the loans that would be added to the principal but I think this cost is small and could be made up from the extra capital growth of a $1M vs $800K asset.
Thanks for the support – at least someone is on board 😂
I do think it’s mostly coming from an emotional knee jerk reaction and future-planning based on fear (which is perfectly understandable). The idea that a person/couple financially savvy enough to build sizeable wealth over the course of 10-20 years who then can’t also qualify for a mortgage is frankly ridiculous. If they can’t qualify, basically no-one will.
And you can’t assume that both house prices will continue to grow way faster than wages and have it magically grow separate from borrowing capacity forever – the money has to come from somewhere. Dual incomes have now been priced in, so there’s not a lot of juice left to squeeze there. Rates could go lower… but they could go higher. So in that case, prices are naturally constrained by borrowing capacity itself, dragging down growth.
Somewhat ironically, I’ve assumed prices keep growing faster than wages and rents, so that means renting will keep getting cheaper relative to owning as yields keep falling (especially for houses) from 4% to 3% to 2%…
Dave,
Interesting article. I would like to understand a little more about your assumptions. You make the very valid point that the savings rate for a young person is their superpower. I would agree. However, the savings rate is not explicit in your example. You only talk about an annual savings amount. No mention of the savings amount as a percentage of a person’s after tax salary.
Hey Steve. In this case, the dollar amount is more important, and I had to pick something for the sake of the example. I simply meant the rate at which they’re saving – I should change that word to be more clear. The savings rate percentage is the most important factor when it comes to determining how long it will take to reach financial independence – a different discussion from this one. Hope that makes sense.